At least one in two consumers experience one or more dark patterns with online payment platforms such as hidden charges, forced action, subscription trap along with bait and switch, a LocalCircles survey has found.
The manipulative practices used by platforms have been called out as dark patterns by the Government of India. The Government, via the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA), has identified 13 types of dark patterns which include false urgency, basket sneaking, confirm shaming, forced action, subscription trap, interface interference, bait and switch, drip pricing, disguised advertisement, nagging, trick questions, SaaS (software as a service) billing and rogue malwares. As per the CCPA notification, dark patterns amount to misleading advertisement or unfair trade practice or violation of consumer rights.
LocalCircles survey received over 45,000 responses from users of online payment platforms located in 376 districts of India. A total of 67% respondents were men, while 33% women. At least 43% respondents were from tier 1, 36% from tier 2 and 21% respondents were from tier 3, 4 and rural districts.
52% EXPERIENCED HIDDEN CHARGES NOT DISCLOSED UPFRONT BUT DEBITED LATER
The survey asked, “How often have you experienced with online payment platforms that there are hidden charges (other than taxes) that are associated with payment transactions which are not disclosed upfront but are debited from your account?”
The query received 11,646 responses, with 27% of respondents indicating “very frequently”; 25% indicating “sometimes” and 16% indicating “rarely”. However, 23% of respondents stated that they have “never” faced hidden charges and 9% of respondents did not give a clear response.
To sum up, 52% users of online payment platforms surveyed have experienced hidden charges (other than taxes) that are associated with payment transactions and not disclosed upfront but are debited from their account later.
67% EXPERIENCED SUBSCRIPTION TRAPS
Subscription trap, a dark pattern wherein the bank account is added, but difficult to stop, is another malpractice that is associated with online payment platforms.
The survey asked, “How often have you experienced a subscription trap with online payment platforms where once you add/ link your bank account for UPI payments they will make it hard for you to remove/ delink it?”
The query received 11,221 responses with 28% of those surveyed indicating “very frequently”; 39% indicating “sometimes” and 11% indicating “rarely”. Of the remaining respondents, 11% stated they have “never” faced this problem and 11% of respondents did not give a clear response.
To sum up, 67% users of online payment platforms surveyed have experienced Subscription Traps where once they added/ linked their bank account for UPI payments they found it hard to remove/ delink it
62% EXPERIENCED BAIT AND SWITCH
Another dark pattern noticed on some online payment platforms is Bait and Switch under which the users are offered a cashback scheme for making extra transactions or adding more money to the wallet but never paid the incentive.
The survey next asked, “How often have you experienced with online payment platforms that a Bait and Switch approach is used?” The query received 11,554 responses with 30% indicating that Bait and Switch approach is used “very frequently”; 32% indicated it happens “sometimes” and 12% stated it “rarely” happens. Of the remaining respondents 15% indicated that they have “never” experienced this dark pattern and 11% of respondents did not give a clear response. To sum up, 62% users of online payment platforms surveyed experienced the Bait and Switch approach where a cashback was advertised to lure them but never actually paid after they signed up/ conducted the specified transaction.
41% EXPERIENCED FORCED ACTION APPROACH
Transaction charges through UPI are meant to be free yet many complain that they are being charged by the online payment platforms or made to maintain a fixed balance in the wallet. Some have also reported on social media that they are forced to give access to their contact list on downloading the online payment apps.
The survey asked, “How often have you experienced with online payment platforms that a Forced Action approach is used?” Of the 10,687 who responded to the query, 16% stated “very frequently”; 25% of respondents stated “sometimes” and 16% stated “rarely”. However, 28% of respondents stated “never” and 15% did not give a clear response.
To sum up, 41% users of online payment platforms surveyed admitted that they experienced the Forced Action approach where either their funds in the online wallet up to a certain amount were blocked or they were forced to share their contact list to use the wallet payment service
LocalCircles is a community social media platform that enables citizens and small businesses to escalate issues for policy and enforcement interventions and enables the Government to make policies that are citizen and small business-centric.
Comments
0 comment