When Penelope Boston was a student at the University of Colorado in the 1980s, she wanted to create a miniature Mars and see how some living things fared on it.
Fundless, she amassed parts from labs around campus and bootstrapped a basic version of what scientists sometimes call a Mars Jar: a sealed container whose insides resemble the red planet, used to test the survival of biological beings. Boston had read about Carl Sagan’s use of Mars Jars and had assumed, as many did, that he’d invented them.
Into her jar, Boston placed microbes and radishes, pumped down the pressure and made the air mixture Martian, fashioning a fake fourth planet from the sun populated by squirming organisms and vegetables.
“It’s a lot like gardening,” she joked.
Mars has long been a repository for such extraterrestrial imaginings. While robotic Mars missions investigate soil composition, drill into rocks and peer into the atmosphere, the bedrock beneath those research questions is biological: Was or is the planet habitable? Was there — could there now be — life? Like missions past, three new missions launching this summer — NASA’s Perseverance, the United Arab Emirates’ Hope and China’s Tianwen-1 — will search for such biological breadcrumbs, a line of work informed by the Mars Jars of Earth.
Boston has gone on to much more sophisticated simulations in her work and has even been the director of NASA’s Astrobiology Institute. But it wasn’t until recently that she learned the true origin of the containers that were so important to her own work — roots that some researchers said affect astrobiology’s present, as well as its future growth.
In 2018, a young scholar, Jordan Bimm, visited her NASA office. He was working on a history of Mars Jars, and he wanted to show her a one-minute film clip from 1958. Pushing play later, Boston saw a midcentury Air Force scientist, dressed in a canonical white lab coat, hooking hoses into a glass container, fiddling with feeds, twisting knobs.
“MARS JARS,” the film’s clapperboard said.
A man named Hubertus Strughold, a professor of space medicine at the Air Force’s School of Aviation Medicine, oversaw the mini movie’s experiments. And he’d done them years before Sagan popularized the jars in print and on the “Cosmos” series on television. This astrobiology technique didn’t begin with academic scientists, Boston realized: It began with airmen.
“That was edifying,” she said. “The military did it first.”
That defense origin still affects Mars research, one of a variety of social issues that more and more researchers working in astrobiology are grappling with. Just as nuclear power has had to reckon with its origins in weaponry and as medicine has had to face the fact that it’s benefited from war wounds, some scholars said that remembering the military mindset in astrobiology’s early years of research could help inform, and perhaps alter, its future.
Astrobiology’s Forgotten Past
Bimm, a postdoctoral researcher at Princeton University, studies the Cold Warriors who researched survival in the harsh environment of space. It’s what led him to the Mars Jars: He was diving into Strughold’s work on astronaut physiology and aviation medicine in the U.S. — work he had started in Nazi Germany for the Luftwaffe and which was tangled up in inhumane experiments.
Strughold didn’t do these experiments himself, and he wasn’t a member of the Nazi party. But on his watch, researchers locked prisoners at the Dachau concentration camp in low-pressure chambers to show what might happen to flyers at high altitude and dressed them in fighter-pilot uniforms only to submerge them in freezing water.
“You don’t get to hold that job for 10 years unless you are 100% in lockstep with the leadership,” Bimm said.
Some scientists have responded to his past in Nazi Germany: The Space Medicine Association, beginning in 1963, bestowed the annual Strughold Award on accomplished researchers. In 2013, after a Wall Street Journal article about Strughold’s connections to inhumane research and a vote from its membership, the organization retired the prize.
After World War II, Strughold arrived in America as part of the secretive Operation Paperclip, which swept German scientists to the United States. Wernher von Braun, who had overseen the Nazi V-2 rocket and later became the architect of NASA’s Saturn V rocket, also came to North America through this program, and the two interacted at space conferences.
One day, Bimm stumbled into an obscure 1950s report that mentioned Mars Jars. “I was like, ‘Wait a second, this is earlier than when people were supposed to be doing this sort of research,’” he said. Since then, he’s been chronicling Strughold’s red planet research, a past that astrobiology itself has largely forgotten.
A few years after Strughold started at the Air Force, he published “Life on Mars in View of Physiological Principles.” Two years later, in 1953, he wrote “The Green and Red Planet,” scientifically coining the term “astrobiology” and considering whether a low-pressure chamber — a shrunken version of those in his aviation experiments — could mimic Mars.
It was a wild idea, and afraid of his colleagues’ judgment, he began a simple version of the experiment at home. He purchased jars and a thermometer, gathered lava and lichens. He put the material and the plants in the jars and let them hang in his kitchen during the day; at night, he put them in the icebox.
Two weeks later, the lichens lived.
Encouraged by the results, Strughold shared them at the office. By 1956, more sophisticated versions of Mars Jars had become part of the Air Force’s research agenda. Imagining a military base on that red-rock planet, the scientists wanted to see if hypothetical Martian microbes might help them create a self-sustaining ecosystem.
At the end of the trials, some life had found a way. Certain microbes even reproduced. “Earth life could survive there, or life could arise — life as we know it — and we might encounter that life there as well,” Bimm said, describing their conclusions. Strughold’s work provided a vision of a microbial Mars that persists today and wasn’t really popular before the jars.
A year later, Strughold hosted “Problems Common to Astronomy and Biology,” the first-ever astrobiology symposium.
Despite these firsts, Strughold isn’t part of most scientists’ remembrances of astrobiology. The typical retelling involves civilian scientists, who crafted and are characters in an origin story that skips over the military scenes.
In that story, astrobiology starts in 1957, when Nobel laureate Joshua Lederberg dines with another biologist during a lunar eclipse and discusses how the Cold War arms and space races could forever confuse the search for alien life.
Lederberg then talked the topic up to officials at the National Academy of Sciences and NASA, calling it not astrobiology but exobiology. Soon enough, it became an official field of study within NASA, and Sagan jumped aboard.
When Sagan put Mars Jars on TV and in other mainstream media, history was repackaged and resealed: Exobiology began with Lederberg and NASA, and many seemed to believe that Mars Jars sprang from Sagan’s mind.
Bimm doesn’t think that’s an accident. He believes scientists attempted to erase, or at least elide, Strughold’s work.
Audra Wolfe, an independent historian, has detailed how Lederberg and his contemporaries tried to pry their astrobiological efforts from the taint of military space ambitions, positioning them as pure science. They hoped the exobiology program “could serve as a neutral scientific counterpart to the hawkish satellite, missile and manned-craft programs that formed the technological and economic core of the space program,” she wrote.
These scientists didn’t want to be associated with security clearances, whose secret-keeping was antithetical to the open nature of science. They desired neutrality — or, at least, the appearance and aspiration of it: In reality, Lederberg had a relationship with Fort Detrick, where the government did biological-weapons research.
Wolfe notes that even neutrality is, of course, a political goal. And no science, not even the purest, exists in a vacuum.
‘Dollhouses of Science’
That includes the Martian jar science of today, like the kind done by Andrew Schuerger, an astrobiologist at the University of Florida.
Schuerger was once a plant pathologist at Disney’s Epcot Center. But he pivoted to astrobiology after scientists announced in 1996 that a Martian meteorite might contain microscopic fossils of alien life. By 2004, he had built his own much more sophisticated Mars Jar, now usually called a Mars Simulation Chamber.
With it, Schuerger has identified about 30 bacteria that can grow in a Mars-esque state. But the conditions he and others simulate — though not pleasant — are not the harshest Mars has to offer, or at least not all the harshest all at once. It’s like dropping a person in the shadiest spot on a stifling desert island, with packaged food and fresh water, and saying, “Look! They’re fine.”
Tweak those conditions — create fluctuations in temperature or water, use Mars-analog soils that also have salts inside — and most microbes wilt. “It just takes a little bit of stress to kick them into a nongrowth environment or situation,” Schuerger said. “I’d like to find out what those minimum thresholds are.”
It’s the same question, really, that Strughold sought to answer.
Strughold’s jars taught him to see the red planet a certain way — and they may provide today’s researchers a similar view. Standing over a simulation chamber, tinkering with settings, watching small beings grow or die, you are the god.
“When you have a Mars Jar, every place looks like a planet you can explore and colonize, and every microbe looks like something you can study, capture and maybe use,” Bimm said.
In Boston’s view, they’re more like “dollhouses of science, where we can try out different realities on the tiny microbial beings that we study.”
“I don’t think of myself as godlike,” she said, “more like childlike.”
Out There and in Here
Understanding past and present colonialist mindsets, along with space exploration’s other psychosocial facets, has long been important to Linda Billings, a communications researcher and an adviser to NASA’s astrobiology program. She’s chronicled scientists’ intermittent attempts to wake themselves to human-centric questions.
“Until about 10 years ago, most of the people who were considering what we call social and conceptual issues were not well equipped,” she said. They were physical scientists playing with social questions.
That’s part of why Billings works with the new Society for Social and Conceptual Issues in Astrobiology: to get actual social and conceptual experts to weigh in. One issue they discuss is how humanity will react if scientists actually find evidence of extraterrestrial life — on Mars or elsewhere.
“Research thus far indicates that the discovery of extraterrestrial microbial life will throw the scientific community into a tizzy but not the global population,” she said.
Scientists may see it as earth-shattering information, in other words, but it may not affect most people’s daily lives. Astrobiologists and SETI scientists — who often search for extraterrestrial life with the assumption that they are doing humanity a favor — would do well to be aware of, and humbled by, that terrestrial context.
Another organization, the JustSpace Alliance, was founded with complementary goals, aiming to investigate questions such as “who environments are for and what the worth of an environment is,” said Lucianne Walkowicz, an astronomer at Chicago’s Adler Planetarium who formed JustSpace in 2018 with Erika Nesvold, an astrophysicist who works as a developer for an astronomy educational software company.
Space types aren’t necessarily used to thinking about these soft ideas.
“‘The stars are just pure science. You don’t have to worry about that,’” Nesvold said, imitating one typical attitude. You only need to worry about how to make a rocket engine, decelerate a rover through an atmosphere, polish a telescope mirror.
But that’s not true: Every exploration of the out there comes from in here. And so it carries as cargo the problems, positives and past of the society that wrought it. That is why Bimm cares where Mars Jars really came from.
“It’s not only Mars that’s in the jar,” he said. “We’re in there, too.”
Sarah Scoles c.2020 The New York Times Company
Comments
0 comment