The Karnataka High Court recently denied bail to a government primary school teacher accused of sexually assaulting minor girl students. The Court noted that the teacher had not only allegedly harassed girl students, but had also threatened them of spoiling their name and future.
A bench of Justice Umesh M Adiga noted in the order that although in our country, teachers are respected like God, because of the alleged behaviour of the accused teacher, parents would think twice about sending their girl child to school.
“It may spoil name, fame and future of the said girl students. It is not a crime against the individual, but crime against a society,” the judge observed.
The court was dealing with the bail plea filed by the accused teacher.
The prosecution case was that the petitioner had been working as an Assistant Teacher in the Government Primary School, Boragunte village for six-seven years prior to the time when the matter was reported. He had been allegedly harassing sexually minor girl students studying in classes IV to VI.
It was only in March 2023 that the villagers informed the Block Education Officer (BEO) about the illegal acts of the accused petitioner and when the BEO visited the said school, some girl students, studying in IV and V standards, stated the accused used to touch their private parts and talk to them in an obscene manner.
The girls also informed the officers that the accused also used to ask them to touch his private part after undressing himself.
Thereafter, the BEO lodged a written complaint and the police registered a case for the offences punishable under Sections 8 & 12 of the POCSO Act. A chargesheet was also submitted before the Fast Track Special Court.
The accused teacher was then arrested on March 27 and had been in custody since then. His bail plea was also rejected by the Fast Track Court.
Before the high court, the counsel for the accused teacher argued that the accused had been teaching at the said school for a few years and there had not been any complaint against him.
The counsel claimed that as the accused teacher had objected to a petty shop proposed by a villager in the school premises, the villagers had falsely implicated him in the present case.
However, the court noted that the Fast Track Court had elaborately discussed all the said points as well as the point of law involved in the present case and rejected the bail application. The court held that the accused teacher did not deserve to be released on bail at the present stage.
Comments
0 comment