Kolkata: The Calcutta High Court on Monday refused to pass an interim order restraining the West Bengal government from distributing land to farmers in Singur which it took back from Tata Motors by enacting a law.
Justice Saumitra Pal refused to pass the interim stay observing that the court found that in the Tata Motors Limited petition, no specific statement had been made that the process of land distribution would start from Tuesday.
Justice Pal noted the petitioner has submitted that if the prayer was not allowed and land distributed, the original petition challenging the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011 would become infructuous.
Tata Motors counsel Samaraditya Pal moved an ex-parte petition seeking stay on distribution of land expressing apprehension that it would be distributed to "unwilling" farmers within a day or two.
He submitted that forms have been distributed by the administration to unwilling farmers in Singur on Sunday.
Appearing for the West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation, senior counsel Saktinath Mukherjee opposed the prayer claiming that an ex-parte petition could not be moved when the opposite party was present in the court.
Following this, TML counsels moved a division bench comprising Justices Pratap Roy and M A Ghani before recess and sought to move an oral prayer for an interim stay on distribution of land, but the court directed them to file a written petition and serve notice to the Advocate General, and asked them to move the petition after the interval.
The TML counsels, however, did not move the bench again, though several government lawyers were present in the court to contest their prayer.
Meanwhile, the West Bengal government filed a caveat before the Supreme Court so that any petition by Tata Motors Ltd over Singur land before it was not heard ex-parte.
The Singur Act 2011 was notified on June 21 and on the same day the West Bengal government took possession of the land measuring 997.97 acre at Singur.
TML moved the court on June 22 challenging the Act and sought an interim stay on any activity by the state on the land.
Comments
0 comment